Vol. 164 / No. 1434
Vol. 164 / No. 1434
Winslow Homer:
Crosscurrents, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 11th April–31st July / Winslow
Homer: Force of Nature National Gallery, London 10th September 2022– 8th
January 2023
In 1999 the artist Allan Sekula entered Lake Washington,
near Seattle, and photographed himself swimming towards Bill Gates’s shoreline
home. The resulting photographs accompanied a letter the artist wrote to Gates
in 2002 about his purchase of Winslow Homer’s 1885 painting Lost on the Grand Banks for more than
$30 million. ‘So why are you so interested in a picture of two poor lost dory
fishermen, momentarily high on a swell, peering into a wall of fog?’ Sekula
wonders. [1] ‘They are going to die, you know, and it won’t be a pretty death’.
The fishermen’s position, adrift in a vast and occluded world, seemed for
Sekula to model the unmoored, exposed condition of workers in late global
capitalism. ‘And as for you’, he asks Gates, ‘are you lost? Or found?’.
Like Sekula, who saw in Homer the ‘hidden brutality’ of
extractive labour and empire, this exhibition presses its visitors to see anew
the dislocation, violence and social misery that course through the artist’s
work. Setting Homer’s work against the emergence of the United States as a
global power in the later nineteenth century – and the wider history of war,
slavery and empire in the Americas – Winslow
Homer: Crosscurrents and its catalogue also resituated the often isolated,
frozen figures of his paintings within history. [2] The exhibition was curated
by Stephanie Herdrich and Sylvia Yount, in association with Christopher
Riopelle, who has also organised a smaller version of the show, which opens at
the National Gallery, London, this month. [3]
At the centre of the iteration at the Metropolitan Museum of
Art, where it was seen by this reviewer, was a painting that emerges from the
matrix of these historical conditions: Homer’s
The Gulf Stream (Fig.17). The painting shows a Black man adrift on a
mastless boat, circled by sharks. Harsh sun glints on his skin, a watery vortex
looms at the horizon (as does a ghostly ship). Early viewers were disquieted by
thoughts of this man’s impending death. In her wide-ranging catalogue essay,
which addresses themes of mortality and conflict in Homer’s work, Herdrich
references a famous letter the artist wrote to his dealer, M. Knoedler &
Co., New York, in 1902. In it Homer responded sarcastically to anxious queries
about the painting, stating that its viewers could be informed that this man
‘will be rescued & returned to his friends and home & ever after live
happily’ (p.143). The point, for Homer, was that his paintings avoided simple
closure. He insisted, instead, that the painting was about the Gulf Stream
itself. As the historian Daniel Immerwahr notes in his catalogue essay on this
warm current of water, flowing from the Caribbean to northern Europe, provided
the natural infrastructure for the transatlantic slave trade and colonial
commodity networks. The Gulf Stream
stood in the exhibition as an emblem of Homer’s persistent ambivalence about
the relationship of individuals to such enormous, almost invisible systems –
both historical and natural.
Born in 1836 in Boston and trained in a lithographer’s
studio, Homer emerged to prominence as an artist in the 1860s, lacking any of
the European education considered a prerequisite for painters. This fact was
central to his status as a uniquely ‘native’ American painter of rugged scenery
and rural leisure. But as recent work has underscored, Homer’s travels outside
the borders of the north-east United States deeply shaped his work, not only
his time in Paris in 1866–67 but also his 1881 stay in Cullercoats, a fishing
village in north-east England. [4] Less attention has been paid to the effect
of Homer’s repeated visits between 1884 and 1903 to the transnational, colonial
space of the Caribbean, including Florida, the Bahamas, Bermuda and Cuba. [5]
His works made in and about the Caribbean archipelago, amid his crossings and
recrossings of the Gulf Stream, formed the core of what was otherwise a broad
survey – suggesting that the issues of power, violence and race that surface in
his Caribbean works echo both forwards and backwards in the artist’s career.
The exhibition was organised into eight roughly
chronological sections gathering works around key themes. It opened with
paintings made during the American Civil War, when Homer produced celebrated
woodcut illustrations for Harper’s Weekly.
His painting Sharpshooter (1863;
Portland Museum of Art, Maine) portrays a Union Army gunman perched in a tree.
This kind of hovering viewpoint – dislocated from its ground yet unmistakably
enmeshed in a larger world –returns constantly in his work, both as an imagined
vantage of his painted subjects and the position of the painter’s virtual eye.
[6] His images of war and ‘camp life’ were followed by a series of ambiguous
images of post-war social reassembly. The war’s aftershocks might be seen, for
example, telegraphing through the tenuously linked chain of young Northern
schoolboys at play in Snap the whip (Fig.19),
as one child is sent sprawling toward the earth by the transmitted force.
Homer also attended to the ways that racism and the
afterlives of slavery continued to delimit the lives of Black Americans.
Although this attentiveness was relatively anomalous at the time, its
articulation had limits. As Gwendolyn DuBois Shaw argues in her catalogue
essay, Homer’s paintings of Black subjects in this period were shaped by tropes
and techniques derived from minstrelsy and artistic theories of colour calibrated
to celebrate light skin. The incompletion of emancipation – shadowed by the
racial terror unleashed during Reconstruction – haunts the halting, restrained
encounter of a group of women with their former enslaver in A visit from the old mistress (1876;
Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington). The two young women in his Cotton pickers (1876; Los Angeles County
Museum of Art), meanwhile, confront their continued confinement in a world of
voracious commerce. That the latter painting was bought (as the artist had
hoped) by an English cotton merchant demonstrates how Homer’s work was enmeshed
in a trans-Atlantic world of plantation economies. [7]
Whereas this section suggested how violence took hold as a
central subject in Homer’s work, the next two sections considered how the
Atlantic – a site of leisure, commerce and peril – emerged as a significant
subject for the artist. His time spent painting in the fishing port of
Gloucester, Massachusetts, in 1873 and 1880, followed by his trip to
Cullercoats, resulted in works that turn on the confrontation of its figures
with the forces of the oceanic world. This sometimes took the form of highly
charged scenes, as in the twisting conglomeration of bodies suspended in The life line (1884; Philadelphia Museum
of Art), in which a male rescuer clings to a woman’s body as they are swung
from a wrecked ship. But in other works, this confrontation could be pensive,
disquieting in other ways. In some cases, his figures’ gestures open up
inscrutably intense sea water out of her clothing in Eagle Head, Manchester, Massachusetts (high tide) (1870;
Metropolitan Museum) or the sailors in Eight
bells (1886; Addison Gallery of American Art, Andover) shown quietly
examining their navigation instruments.
The exhibition aimed to reconnect Homer’s Caribbean works to
the oceanic space of Eight bells, with which the painter is so closely
associated. Here, lucid, brilliant watercolours formed the key record of the
artist’s encounter. They were also probably the least familiar works in the
exhibition. The watercolours showed Homer moving at the margins of the spaces
of white tourism, seemingly untouched by colonial control (although
periodically marked by its flags and other emblems). Yet they are traversed by
an uncertain energy – a kind of vacuum of narrative. The fishermen in his Nassau (1899; Metropolitan Museum) are
suspended in the quiet harbour, but what about the half-buried cannons strewn
in the white sand? As Herdrich notes in her essay, overt figurations of
turbulence are displaced onto natural forces, as in his Hurricane, Bahamas (Fig.18), in which palm trees – usually placid
symbols of ‘tropicality’ – are blown by the wind into quietly explosive stars.
It is also in this liquid, often provisional medium that
Homer worked out the choreography of The
Gulf Stream. The painting was exhibited alongside a suite of watercolours
that study the sharks, the boat, the sugar cane hanging out of its hull, the
man’s pose, all in slightly different configurations. They suggest the
uncertain syntax of Homer’s intended narrative and how it might or might not
finally cohere. Yet in After the
Hurricane, Bahamas (1899; Art Institute of Chicago) this question seems
answered by Homer’s austere rendering of a Black man washed ashore, his body
entwined with the splintered remnants of a boat. In another, Sharks (the
derelict) (1885; Brooklyn Museum, New York), the man has disappeared
altogether, leaving only the menacing sharks as they circle the dark void of
the ship’s listing hull, water cresting over the deck.
In the final sections of the exhibition, including works
both preceding and following The Gulf
Stream, the stoic endurance of Homer’s Black sailor was posed against the
various protagonists – human and otherwise – of Homer’s later works, often made
in the woods of the Adirondack Mountains or at Prouts Neck on the coast of
Maine, where he lived from 1883. In these works, the dramatic gestures of his
earlier scenes seep out from the human figure into the waves and winds of the
oceanic world – a world in which the currents of the Gulf Stream are interwoven
with the crashing waves roiled by a Nor’easter in Maine. The exhibition
suggested that we should not see the figures of these later paintings, such as Winter coast (1890; Philadelphia Museum
of Art), as impossibly isolated in allegorical struggle. They too are part of
history.
We are left, then, with the persistent undecidability of The Gulf Stream. The painting served
here as a kind of refracting lens, gathering up the energies of Homer’s
extended thinking about oceanic space, violence and race, only to disperse it
into new configurations. If the painting is meant to absorb these grave forces,
it seems constantly to deflect them: whether in the face of the Black man, his
gaze turned askance; or in the crystalline, opaque nature of its facture; or in
the structure of the painting itself, where the all-over field formed by the
churning waves terminates in the distant waterspout, propelling us out of the
frame. Homer’s claim that the figures in the painting (both the sharks and the
Black man) were only of incidental interest to the real subject of the ocean
seems like a wilful misdirection. Derek Walcott – a poet deeply interested in
Homer’s work – and many other writers on the Black Atlantic have articulated
how the ocean itself is a grim repository of the histories that unfolded in its
waters. [8] Seen here, Homer’s painting seemed to register this in its own,
partial way. That the burden of articulating the Atlantic’s historicity in The Gulf Stream falls upon a Black
figure is unsurprising – another rearticulation of the limits that are so often
placed on the possibilities of Black life. Yet Homer’s work suggests the ways
that even narratives that appear concluded – wars that end, drownings that are
avoided, children’s games that disperse – are never quite so finished.
[1] Allan Sekula’s photographs and letter are reproduced in
idem: ‘Between the net and the deep blue sea (rethinking the traffic in
photographs)’, October 102 (2002), pp.3–34, at p.4.
[2] Catalogue: Winslow
Homer: Crosscurrents. By Stephanie L. Herdrich and Sylvia Yount. 200 pp.
incl. 140 col. ills. (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2022), $50. ISBN
978–1–58839–747–8.
[3] Catalogue: Winslow Homer: Force of Nature. By
Christopher Riopelle, Christine Riding and Chiara Di Stefano. 128 pp. incl. 85
col. ills. (National Gallery, London, 2022), £18.99. ISBN 978–1–85709–687–3.
[4] See S. Yount: ‘Reconsidering Winslow Homer: methods and
meanings’; and C. Riopelle: ‘“These works are real”: Winslow Homer and Europe’,
in Herdrich and Yount, op. cit. (note 2), pp.12–19 and 84–92.
[5] The notable exception is D. Byrd: ‘Trouble in paradise?:
Winslow Homer in the Bahamas, Cuba, and Florida, 1884–1886’, in idem and F.H.
Goodyear III: exh. cat. Winslow Homer and the Camera: Photography and the Art of
Painting, Brunswick ME (Bowdoin College Museum of Art) 2018, pp.103–40.
[6] See B. Wolf: ‘The labor of seeing: pragmatism, ideology,
and gender in Winslow Homer’s “The Morning Bell”’, Prospects 17 (1992),
pp.273–318.
[7] See A. Arabindan-Kesson: Black Bodies, White Gold: Art,
Cotton, and Commerce in the Atlantic World, Durham and London 2021, pp.141–48.
[8] D. Walcott: ‘The sea is history’, in G. Maxwell, ed.:
The Poetry of Derek Walcott, 1948–2013, New York 2014, pp.253–56. Walcott
writes about his encounter with The Gulf
Stream in his epic poem Omeros (1990).